Home < Bitcoin++ < Lightning Specification < Bitcoin Review Podcast < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2023 (Sept) < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2023 (Apr) < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2022 < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2019 < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2018 (Oct) < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2018 (Mar) < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2017 < Bitcoin Core Dev Tech 2015 < Stephan Livera Podcast < Advancing Bitcoin < Bitcoin Magazine < Bitcointranscripts < TABConf < London Bitcoin Devs < Misc < MIT Bitcoin Expo < Greg Maxwell < Chaincode Labs < Sydney Bitcoin Meetup < Bitcoinology < c-lightning < Adopting Bitcoin < IACR Crypto < Wasabi Research Club < Lightning Hack Day < Blockstream Webinars < Munich Meetup < TFTC Podcast < Realworldcrypto < SF Bitcoin Meetup < CPPcon < Bitcoin Design < Chicago Bitdevs < VR Bitcoin < LA Bitdevs < Ruben Somsen < Honey Badger Diaries < Andreas Antonopoulos < Austin Bitcoin Developers < Stanford Blockchain < Coordination of Decentralized Finance < Lightning Conference < Cryptoeconomic Systems < Bitcoinops < Baltic Honeybadger < Scaling Bitcoin Conference < Bitcoin Edge Dev++ < Decentralized Financial Architecture Workshop < Dallas Bitcoin Symposium < Breaking Bitcoin < Lets Talk Bitcoin Podcast < What Bitcoin Did Podcast < Magicalcryptoconference < Noded Podcast < Boltathon < Grincon < Verifiable Delay Functions < Building On Bitcoin < Layer2 Summit < Satoshi Roundtable < Blockchain Protocol Analysis Security Eng < Developers-Miners Meeting < W3 Blockchain Workshop < Simons Institute < Bit Block Boom < Coindesk Consensus < Rebooting Web Of Trust < Texas Bitcoin Conference < Research wishlist

Research wishlist

Date: October 12, 2022

Transcript By: Bryan Bishop

Tags: Research

Category: Core dev tech

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1oRCeDzY3zH2ZY-BUYIVfJ1GMkvLlqKHWCFdtS62QWAo/edit

Introduction

In spirit of the conversation happening today earlier, I’ll give some motivation. In general there is a disconnect between academic researchers and people who work in open-source software. It’s a pity because these two groups are interested in bitcoin, they love difficult questions and working on them, and somehow it seems like the choice of questions and spirit of work is sometimes not aligned to the best of bitcoin.

There is an effort at Chaincode to start bridging this gap. A general background is that we have a research seminar, and there will be a research prize specifically for peer-reviewed in journal papers to try to reach out to academics about things that they are interested in. There’s a lot of people working on things to work on and they don’t know what the options are out there. There are people that really want to do meaningful that would have an effect. They go around and find something and create a model and then nothing makes sense and everybody ignores it. Then they get disinterested and move on.

Steps

In general when it comes to getting problems from this community… there are three steps: collecting, curation and distribution. There is openbitcoinproblems.org where you can add some items. I just threw up a Google Doc. This document can help us contact you if we don’t understand the research topic. I just think it’s something that can be done by walking around and asking what would be nice to solve.

Often they want a problem that is both approachable and meaningful. Not everything that we write down and people would bring up has the same kind of impact. Curation is something that could kind of happen on a personal level. I have some problems that I care about more than others. Starting from a list.

Idea collection

This is an open call for the raw list of ideas that you would like people to work on.

https://bitcoinproblems.org/